Discussing the extensive Russia/USA negotiations, potential timelines for Israel escalating against Iran/Lebanon, UAE/Saudi factions clash in Yemen, the future of Venezuela, Church news, & MORE!
Great episode as always gentlemen. One comment on the topic of the Orthodox Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople's meeting with a certain guy from Chicago the other week... That guy from Chicago - Robert Prevost - is not the pope. The last pope of the Catholic Church was the late Pope Benedict XVI. There was no "Pope Francis" and there is no "Pope Leo." Both of those scoundrels were/are antipopes. Pope Benedict's so-called resignation in 2013 was completely invalid per canon law and it wasn't really a resignation because he still kept the papal ring, still wore white, still lived in the Vatican, still gave apostolic blessings and the most telling sign was that antipope Bergoglio always brought his appointments for cardinals to "Pope Emeritus" Benedict for blessings. That's the legal and the visible signs that Pope Benedict retained the papacy until is death. Now that aside, it is not possible for a non-Catholic to be the pope and when you look at everything Jorge Bergoglio said and did, all of it, 100 percent of it, was contrary to the teachings of the Catholic Church. If Jorge Bergoglio can be a legitimate pope than so can a talmudic jew, a muslim and hell, why not some Amazonian witch doctor who is permanently stoned on cocoa leaves and guano-infested water? As for Robert Prevost... turns out he was the hand-picked successor by Bergoglio himself so the "conclave" that elected him was a procedural scam. Robert Prevost is younger, smarter and better mannered than his wicked, satanic predecessor but he's every bit as heretical as Bergoglio was by his actions (and his in-actions). Like Bergoglio, there's nothing Catholic about this scoundrel and on that note alone, he's an antipope.
Thank you for the comment brother but to be perfectly honest none of this matters. The popes of Rome have been heretical for over 1000 years. There are no “valid” bishops of Rome at all
Great episode as always gentlemen. One comment on the topic of the Orthodox Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople's meeting with a certain guy from Chicago the other week... That guy from Chicago - Robert Prevost - is not the pope. The last pope of the Catholic Church was the late Pope Benedict XVI. There was no "Pope Francis" and there is no "Pope Leo." Both of those scoundrels were/are antipopes. Pope Benedict's so-called resignation in 2013 was completely invalid per canon law and it wasn't really a resignation because he still kept the papal ring, still wore white, still lived in the Vatican, still gave apostolic blessings and the most telling sign was that antipope Bergoglio always brought his appointments for cardinals to "Pope Emeritus" Benedict for blessings. That's the legal and the visible signs that Pope Benedict retained the papacy until is death. Now that aside, it is not possible for a non-Catholic to be the pope and when you look at everything Jorge Bergoglio said and did, all of it, 100 percent of it, was contrary to the teachings of the Catholic Church. If Jorge Bergoglio can be a legitimate pope than so can a talmudic jew, a muslim and hell, why not some Amazonian witch doctor who is permanently stoned on cocoa leaves and guano-infested water? As for Robert Prevost... turns out he was the hand-picked successor by Bergoglio himself so the "conclave" that elected him was a procedural scam. Robert Prevost is younger, smarter and better mannered than his wicked, satanic predecessor but he's every bit as heretical as Bergoglio was by his actions (and his in-actions). Like Bergoglio, there's nothing Catholic about this scoundrel and on that note alone, he's an antipope.
Thank you for the comment brother but to be perfectly honest none of this matters. The popes of Rome have been heretical for over 1000 years. There are no “valid” bishops of Rome at all